An Educated Politician
Before Woodrow Wilson became president, he was a scholar of politics and history. To this day, he is the only U.S. President to have acquired a Ph.D. His knowledge led him to publish many important essays in Political Science Quarterly, including his most influential work, “The Study of Administration,” published in 1887.
Believed in a Skilled Bureaucracy
Up until 1884, the administration of the U.S. government was carried out by workers hired through the “spoils system,” a system that valued a person’s faithfulness to a political party, not their level of skill. As a result, the U.S. bureaucracy became very inefficient. In Wilson’s seminal essay, “The Study of Administration,” he proposes that administration should be run by skilled workers selected based on merit, not elected by the people or chosen by politicians.
First to Illustrate the Policy/Administration Dichotomy
The idea that politicians should create and execute policy and administrators should help them do it, regardless of their political views, is known as the policy/administration dichotomy. Wilson was one of the earliest supporters of this theory. In “The Study of Administration,” he wrote that “…administration lies outside the proper sphere of politics.” He compares administration to a machine that can efficiently run independently of politicians’ changing views.
Believed Administration Should Run Like a Business
Image via Flickr by cliff1066™
In his essay, Wilson argues that comparative analyses should be made between the government and a privately owned organization. The focus of government is not on making profit, but it should still aspire to run efficiently, much like a business. Hiring employees for the business (administrators) should involve an assessment of the potential employee’s skill level, then training and proper management after hiring.
Broke Down Every Government’s Development Into Three Periods
According to Wilson, all developed governments form over the same three periods of growth. First, the nation succumbs to an absolute ruler who imposes government administration. Second, the nation develops a constitution to oppose the absolute ruler and form a government influenced by the popular vote. It isn’t until the third stage that governments are able to develop their administrations to properly support their new constitutions.
Applauded the Methods of Napoleon Bonaparte
Wilson brings up several nations when discussing his three-part government development theory. The U.S. and England make the list, but surprisingly, so do Napoleon’s France and Frederic the Great’s Prussia. At the same time that Wilson denounces Napoleon as a “despot,” he also praises his ability to organize the government’s administration efficiently, writing that, “No corporate, popular will could ever have effected arrangements such as those which Napoleon commanded.”
Wilson’s foundational concepts of public administration were once considered revolutionary and contributed to the progressive movement in the United States. Without Wilson’s work, public administration may have taken many more years to be regarded and studied for the science it is.
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
Moura, David P. and Miller, Hugh T. 2016. On Legitimacy. Administration & Society, p. 009539971667093.
Godwin, Marcia L and Meek, Jack W 2016. The scholarly practitioner. Teaching Public Administration, Vol. 34, Issue. 1, p. 54.
Yongki Kang 2016. A Study on the Origin of Public Administration as an Academic Discipline with the History of Administration : Europe and U.S.A.. Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 81.
Heidelberg, Roy L. 2015. Public Administration, Popular Sovereignty, andla Police. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 162.
Baker, Dana Lee Miller, Audrey Anna and Bratton, Todd 2015. E’s are good. Teaching Public Administration, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 130.
Mishra, Soumya and Palo, Sasmita 2014. Applying Theory of Constraints to the Indian Administrative Services. Management and Labour Studies, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 187.
Georgiou, Ion 2014. Seeing the Forest for the Trees: An Atlas of the Politics-Administration Dichotomy. Public Administration Review, Vol. 74, Issue. 2, p. 156.
McCandless, Sean A. and Guy, Mary E. 2013. One More Time. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 356.
2012. The Politics-Administration Dichotomy. p. 199.
Rosser, Christian 2010. Woodrow Wilson’s Administrative Thought and German Political Theory. Public Administration Review, Vol. 70, Issue. 4, p. 547.
Sager, Fritz and Rosser, Christian 2009. Weber, Wilson, and Hegel: Theories of Modern Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, Vol. 69, Issue. 6, p. 1136.
RUDALEVIGE, ANDREW 2009. The Administrative Presidency and Bureaucratic Control: Implementing a Research Agenda. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 39, Issue. 1, p. 10.
Lynn, Laurence E. 2008. New Frontiers of Public Administration: The Practice of Theory and the Theory of Practice. PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 41, Issue. 01, p. 3.
Gabrielian, Vatche and Holzer, Marc 2008. Principles And Practices Of Public Administration.
Golembiewski, Robert 2008. Principles And Practices Of Public Administration.
Keller, Lawrence 2006. Handbook of Public Administration, Third Edition. Vol. 20067041, Issue. , p. 3.
Gargan, John 2006. Handbook of Public Administration, Third Edition. Vol. 20067041, Issue. , p. 1125.
Holzer, Marc Gabrielyan, Vache and Yang, Kaifeng 2006. Handbook of Public Administration, Third Edition. Vol. 20067041, Issue. , p. 49.
Cook, Brian 2005. Handbook of Organization Theory and Management. Vol. 20056438, Issue. ,
Raadschelders, Jos C. N. 2002. Woodrow Wilson on the History of Government. Administration & Society, Vol. 34, Issue. 5, p. 579.
Download full list